Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
The spark that ignited tea party wrath in 2008 was not such right-wing bugaboos as "Obamacare," the federal deficit, or states' rights, which were added on later by Koch-created front groups. Rather, the uprising sprang directly from the public's raw outrage over Washington's flagrant coddling of Wall Street banksters.
| www.flickr.com |
All Flickr photos of Jim Hightower
To add your photos, upload them Flickr and tag them with jimhightower!

It's time to make politics fun again! With uncommon insight, political fearlessness and laugh-out...
[More info]

With his aw-shucks charisma and no-nonsense attitude, he dishes out what's wrong with the eroding...
[More info]

"I make a lot of money these days speaking to corporations, so I'd really prefer not to admit how...
[More info]
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | MDC | RSS | Privacy Policy | Copyright Saddle-Burr Productions, Jim Hightower, All Rights Reserved 1996-2009
Single-moms, child abuse, contraception... and state legislators
Attention ladies: Big news on the state legislative front. Republican lawmakers in Arizona and Wisconsin want to help you improve your lives. Or else.
In Wisconsin, Senator Glenn Grothman wants to give single moms an incentive to get married. Actually, it's a rather negative incentive, for his bill declares that being an unmarried mother constitutes "child abuse and neglect." Interestingly, Glenn has never been married, nor raised any children. But he says his bill is necessary to counter those diabolical liberals who "want children born out of wedlock because they are far more likely to be dependent on the government." Thanks for that insight, Glenn.
Now, on to Arizona, where the GOP-controlled legislature intends to help any and all employers protect the moral purity of their female workers – married or not. How? By letting them deny insurance coverage for birth control pills if the women intend to use the pills for… well, birth control. Ladies will not get the cost of their contraceptives covered, unless they submit proof from their doctors that the pills are necessary to treat a medical condition – NOT just for having non-procreative sex. And, to add some puritanical oomph to the law, it also eases the way for the state's employers to fire any woman who uses contraceptives to – yes – avoid conception.
If that's not perverse enough for you, try this: Rep. Debbie Lesko – the sponsor of Arizona's assault on a woman's freedom, privacy, and dignity – says that the law is necessary to protect "our First Amendment rights and freedom of religion." She means the right and freedom of a boss to violate the rights and freedom of women workers over something as purely personal as their sex lives.
Someone's been munching too much loco weed in Arizona. To keep up with the insanity, go to www.now.org.
"Wisconsin Bills Claims Single Moms Cause Child Abuse By Not Being Married," www.yahoo.com, March 2, 2012.
"Proposed AZ law would let women be fired for using the pill," www.sfgate.com, March 14, 2012.
"Arizona Birth Control Pill Penalizes Women For Using Contraception For Non-Medical Reasons," www.huffingtonpost.com, March 14, 2012.