
In stores March 10: pre-order your copy today!
The political media establishment is enraptured by John McCain. Mainline media sparklies, as well as the blatherers on the Fox channel, routinely buff up his image as a straight-talking, maverick foe of Washington's special interests. "The press loves McCain. We're his base," gushes MSNBC's Chris Matthews. But if the senator really is the feared reformer of business-as-usual government, why does his presidential campaign look like the back alley of K Street?
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
| www.flickr.com |
All Flickr photos of Jim Hightower
To add your photos, upload them Flickr and tag them with jimhightower!

It's time to make politics fun again! With uncommon insight, political fearlessness and laugh-out...
[More info]

America is at an historic divide between rulers and rulees and the rulees are restless. Hightower...
[More info]

"I make a lot of money these days speaking to corporations, so I'd really prefer not to admit how...
[More info]
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | MDC | RSS | Privacy Policy | Copyright Saddle-Burr Productions, Jim Hightower, All Rights Reserved 1996-2006
WHO IS TO BE "DETAINED?"
Posted by Jim Hightower
Look out – here comes Halliburton again! With its own personal sugar daddy occupying the the vice president's chair, this giant government contractor keeps getting multibillion-dollar, no-bid contracts from the BushCheney regime, despite having been found guilty of shoddy work, massive cost-overruns, and fraudulent billings.
Its latest windfall, however, should not merely be worrisome to tax payers, but also to anyone concerned about the Bushites' anti-democratic penchant to extend ever-more police and military power over We the People. Halliburton has been granted a $385 million contract for a most unusual project: building a network of detention centers across our country. Up to 5,000 people could be "detained" and held in each of these centers, which are to be run by homeland security authorities and possibly located on unused military bases.
"Detain," of course, is a euphemism for "incarcerate" – or "lock up." And "center" is a gentle term for "prison."
So, why does America suddenly need to spend a third-of-a-billion dollars to establish a new mass prison complex in our country? The feds and Halliburton cryptically say that the detention centers could be needed for "some kind of mass migration" or for "the rapid development of new programs." When asked what is meant by the ominous term, "new programs," a Halliburton spokeswoman said she could provide no additional information.
Another curious aspect is that the Bushites refer to this as a "contingency contract," saying that the detention centers might never be built, but that Halliburton will have the cash and authority to move quickly if and when given the go-ahead. The corporation's executive vice president says that Halliburton is "gratified," because the deal "builds on our extremely strong track record in the arena of emergency management support."
This is Jim Hightower saying... But who is to be managed, and in support of what policy?
Sources:
"Halliburton Subsidiary Gets Contract to Add Temporary Immigration Detention Centers," The New York Times, February 4, 2006.
"KBR awarded Homeland Security contract worth up to $385M," www.marketwatch.com, January 2, 2006.
"Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps," Pacific News Service, February 6, 2006.
"Report Adds to Criticism of Halliburton's Iraq Role," The New York Times, March 29, 2006.